Judicial Review And Contemporary Democratic Theory: Power, Domination And The Courts paperback english - 09 Nov 2017
Now:
EGP 680.40 Inclusive of VAT
Only 1 left in stock
Get it by 11 Jan
Pay 6 monthly payments of EGP 140.00.
1
Free delivery on Lockers & Pickup Points
Learn more
Enjoy hassle free returns with this offer.
(Original Copy - نسخه أصلية)
Item as Described
80%
Partner Since
5+ Years
Great Recent Rating
Specifications
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| ISBN 13 | 9781138095212 |
| ISBN 10 | 1138095214 |
| Book Description | For decades, the question of judicial review's status in a democratic political system has been adjudicated through the framework of what Alexander Bickel labeled "the counter-majoritarian difficulty." That is, the idea that judicial review is particularly problematic for democracy because it opposes the will of the majority. Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory begins with an assessment of the empirical and theoretical flaws of this framework, and an account of the ways in which this framework has hindered meaningful investigation into judicial review's value within a democratic political system. To replace the counter-majoritarian difficulty framework, Scott E. Lemieux and David J. Watkins draw on recent work in democratic theory emphasizing democracy's opposition to domination and analyses of constitutional court cases in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere to examine judicial review in its institutional and political context.Developing democratic criteria for veto points in a democratic system and comparing them to each other against these criteria, Lemieux and Watkins yield fresh insights into judicial review's democratic value. This book is essential reading for students of law and courts, judicial politics, legal theory and constitutional law. |
| Editorial Review | A wonderful blend of normative and empirical analysis, which asks important questions about whether the judicial review we experience meets democratic standards, as opposed to the more common concern of whether an idealized form of judicial review might meet democratic standards.-Mark A. Graber, Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law. |
| About the Author | Scott E. Lemieux is a Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Washington. His research interests include the relationship between the courts and other political branches, the impact of (and backlash against) judicial rulings, and the democratic legitimacy of judicial review. He has written or co-written articles in journals including Perspectives on Politics, Polity, Studies In Law, Politics and Society, New Political Science, the Maryland Law Review, the Journal of Supreme Court History, and the American Journal of Comparative Law. He is also a co-founder of the blog Lawyers, Guns & Money and contributes regularly to publications including The New Republic, The Week, the Guardian, the Los Angeles Times, and the American Prospect.David J. Watkins is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Dayton, where he teaches historical and contemporary political theory courses, as well as courses on democracy and democratization. His research focuses on contemporary political theory, with particular attention to neorepublican thought. Recently, his work has appeared in journals such as Perspectives on Politics, Political Theory, and Polity. |
| Language | English |
| Author | Scott Lemieux, David Watkins |
| Publication Date | 09 Nov 2017 |
Judicial Review And Contemporary Democratic Theory: Power, Domination And The Courts paperback english - 09 Nov 2017
Added to cart
Cart Total EGP 680.40
